Years
The High Court has not appreciated the meaning of the poem. This is eventually a poem. Justice Oka asked the lawyer Swati Ghildiyal appearing for the state. The bench underlined that the poem was not against any religion or community and in fact, gives the message of peace. The bench insisted that this is eventually a poem.
The Supreme Court on Monday expressed serious concern over the decision of the Gujarat Police to file a first information report (FIR) against Congress Rajya Sabha MP Imran Pratapgadhi to post a poem on social media, questioned that a piece promoting non -violence How the criminal became the subject of the lawsuit. A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjwal Bhuiyan, while hearing the petition of Pratapgadhi, challenging the refusal of the Gujarat High Court, also pulled the state to fail to appreciate the true meaning of the poem, .
The High Court has not appreciated the meaning of the poem. This is eventually a poem. Justice Oka asked the lawyer Swati Ghildiyal appearing for the state. The bench underlined that the poem was not against any religion or community and in fact, gives the message of peace. The bench insisted that this is eventually a poem. It is not against any religion. This poem indirectly says that even if someone does violence, we will not do violence. This is the message that gives poetry. It is not against any particular community.
Expressing disagreement over the Gujarat High Court’s approach, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who represented Pratapgadhi, argued. The judge has committed violence with the law. This is my concern.
Other news
