Years
In many cases you have not challenged the order passed by the Delhi High Court. To say clearly, filing the SLP does not fulfill any purpose until it is filed and prosecuted seriously.
The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the Delhi Police for not filing an appeal against those acquitted in the 1984 anti -Sikh riots cases and said the prosecution should be run seriously and not only for this. A bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan told Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati representing the Delhi Police that special permission petitions should be filed against those acquitted and should be fought honestly. In many cases you have not challenged the order passed by the Delhi High Court. To say clearly, filing the SLP does not fulfill any purpose until it is filed and prosecuted seriously.
You tell us that the cases that were filed earlier, were a senior lawyer imposed to debate them? It will have to be done not only for this but seriously. It should be done with devotion and honesty. We are not saying that the result should be in a special way. Senior advocate HS Phoolka, who is representing the petitioner S. Gurlad Singh Kahl, said the appeal filed by the police was just a formality. Phulka said that the Delhi High Court had given a verdict that the case was hidden and the state did not prosecute properly. During the hearing, the ASG said that letters were written to file an appeal in six cases acquitted. The bench has decided the hearing on 17 February.
It was hearing a PIL filed by Kahl, former member of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, on whose petition, the apex court formed an SIT under the leadership of Justice Dhingra to investigate 199 cases in 2018, where the investigation is closed. Went.
Other news
