Years
The US has given clarification about this whole matter. The United States has told the World Trade Organization, the World Trade Organization, that its decision to put tariff on the import of steel and alummunium was taken on the basis of national security and not as a security measure. America told the difference between these two things and said that there is a big difference between these two things.
After Trump’s tariff, there is a ruckus all over the world about business. The US shocked every country in its own way at the business level. India was also involved in this. America’s tariff on import of India’s steel and aluminalium was a big burden for India and as a result India had to go to the World Trade Organization with its complaint. Now the World Trade Organization is called America and sought an answer on this. The US has given clarification about this whole matter. The United States has told the World Trade Organization, the World Trade Organization, that its decision to put tariff on the import of steel and alummunium was taken on the basis of national security and not as a security measure. America told the difference between these two things and said that there is a big difference between these two things.
Let us know that India had filed a complaint in the World Trade Organization earlier this month. The US gave clarification on this complaint formally. In the statement, the US said that tariffs were imposed under Section 232 of the US Trade Act, which gives the President the right to ban the imports that damage national security. The statement said that the US has noted that India’s request for consultation under Article 12.3 of the agreement on security measures is that tariff is safety measures. That is, under the security measures, the US decided to impose tariffs against India.
In fact, the US had announced a tariff on the steel and alummunes being exported by India. India went to the World Trade Organization in protest against this. Which is said to be valid by America. India filed this complaint at the World Trade Organization on 11 April. India had argued that no matter how the US to label them, it is basically a safety measure that comes with clear obligations under the WTO rules including formal notifications and counseling. India said that despite the US describing these measures as security measures, it is basically a safety measure. India has accused the US of failing to inform the WTO Safety Committee required under agreement on security measures.
Other news
