Rohingya Muslims are constantly presenting challenges for the security of India and the law and order of various states, so there is a demand to get them out of the country, but there are some people in our country who want Rohingya to stay here and also get citizenship here. The reprimand that such people have reprimanded by such people is historic. Let us tell you that the Supreme Court on Friday reprimanded the petitioners who claimed that 43 Rohingya refugees, including women and children, were released into the Andaman Sea to deport Myanma. The apex court said, “When the country is going through a difficult time, you are coming out with imaginary ideas.” Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. A bench of Kotishwar Singh also questioned the authenticity of the content presented by Mohammad Ismail and other petitioners and refused to stop the exile of Rohingya refugees. The bench told senior advocate Colin Gonzalvage, appearing for the petitioners, “When the country is going through a difficult time, you are coming out with such fictional ideas.” The bench said that the material presented by the petitioners seems to be raised from social media and called Rohingya refugees in the sea to torture and deported the claims as “just allegations”. Justice Surya Kant asked, “Where is the material that certifies the allegations?”
The bench said that the recording of the alleged conversation between the exile Rohingya refugees and the petitioner resident of Delhi is not verified. Justice Surya Kant said, “Has anyone verified that phone calls came from Myanma? Gonzalvage, citing the report of the United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner, said that it too took cognizance of the issue and started investigating the case. To this, the bench said, “People sitting outside cannot direct our authorities and sovereignty.” The bench, however, directed Gonzalvage to submit a copy of the petition to the Attorney General and Solicitor General’s office, so that it could be conveyed to the authorities concerned in the government. The bench listed the hearing of the case on 31 July before a bench of three judges.
Also read: Yes Milord: Did you take it lightly? What can be the possibility after the President sending the list of 14 questions to SC?
At the same time, the High Court was upset with repeated PIL (PIL) filed to prevent the alleged expulsion process of Rohingya Muslims and asked Senior Advocate Gonzalvage that he could not file a PIL on the same issue repeatedly, demanding amendment in the Supreme Court’s decision of May 8, demanding amendment in the Supreme Court’s decision of 8 May. Let us remind you that on May 8, Justice Suryakant, Dipankar Dutta and N. The bench of Kotishwar Singh refused to stop interim prohibits on the possible expulsion of Rohingyas, despite Gonzalvage and Prashant Bhushan’s strong arguments. The bench had said that Rohingya is not an Indian citizen, so they do not have the right to live anywhere in the country.
Let us tell you that Gonzalvage had said that on May 8 itself, the central government deported 28 Rohingyas, wearing handcuffs to Andaman Island, life jacket was worn and pushed towards Myanmar. After reaching Myanmar somehow, he called his relatives in Delhi with the help of fishermen and informed that his life was immediately threatened. On this, the bench said that these are just allegations, and who will verify that these facts are correct according to the petitioner’s information. Gonzalvez also cited a decision on the security of the Supreme Court’s dodge refugees to provide relief to the Rohingyas. He also mentioned the United Nations report and an order of the International Court of Court (ICJ), saying that Rohingya is not a migrant but refugee, whose life is the responsibility of the United Nations. To this, the bench said, “We do not want to comment on the United Nations report today. We will answer it on 31 July, when this petition will be taken for hearing with a pending petition.” On this, Gonzalvage said that in the meantime, the government and the Rohingyas will be expelled, whose number is more than 8,000 in different parts of the country and about 800 in Delhi.
