Creative Commons licenses
The question is also arising that who gave legal protection to Aurangzeb’s tomb? Who is that due to which the tax money paid by the hard earned money of the common people is being spent in the preservation of Aurangzeb or other invaders?
Voices are raising in favor of removing the tomb of Aurangzeb located in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar district in Maharashtra. All political parties are also seen standing in its favor. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis himself has said that everyone believes that the tomb of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb located in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar should be removed, but he has also said that this work should be done within the scope of law. Now the question arises that what is the scope of the law that stands as a shield for the tomb of Aurangzeb? The question is also arising that who gave legal protection to Aurangzeb’s tomb? Who is that due to which the tax money paid by the hard earned money of the common people is being spent in the preservation of Aurangzeb or other invaders?
Let us tell you that the previous Congress government had given Aurangzeb’s tomb under the patronage of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). Earlier, the ancient monument and archaeological site and relics Act made by the Congress government in 1958 was to maintain the nomination of slavery. Let us tell you that the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and Remnants Act, 1958 aims to protect and protect archaeological and historical monuments and sites. Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) works under the provisions of this Act. Many controversies recently arising that this act should be abolished or changed. Government spending should be stopped under the protection of Aurangzeb and the tomb or tomb of invaders like that. Ashwini Upadhyay, a senior advocate of the Supreme Court and the PIL Man of India, has explained in a special offer, why is it necessary to change the Congress and English law?
Let us also tell you that Samajwadi Party (SP) MLA Abu Asim Azmi was suspended for the remaining period of the budget session ending March 26 from Maharashtra Legislative Assembly last week due to the commentary of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. Maharashtra Minister Chandrakant Patil proposed Azmi’s suspension for the remaining period in the House. Members of the ruling party said that making a statement in praise of Aurangzeb is an insult to Maratha king Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and his son Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. The proposal was passed by sounds. Patil said, “Azmi’s comments, who praised Aurangzeb and criticizing Sambhaji Maharaj, does not suit a member of an assembly and is an insult to the assembly.” It is noteworthy that SP’s Maharashtra unit president Azmi had said that India’s border reached Afghanistan and Burma (Myanma) during Aurangzeb’s reign.
Other news
