The political competition of Muslim invaders and British terrorists in the Sanatan Bhoomi Bharatvarsha, Jambudweep, Aryavarta, Aseeta Himalaya, etc. is called by various names, is unfortunate, which is unfortunate every now and then. The question is why various insignificant symbols related to them, etc., why the villages and cities, enrolled roads or various institutions are not erased in their name, because they are the maintenance of wounds leaking on the eternal land.
The question is also the question of what is their need today, who is and why? And if it is, then such traitors are needed here? If cruel Muslim rulers like Babur, Akbar, Aurangzeb or cruel British officials like General Dyer or cruel terrorists like Osama bin Laden, Kasab, well-wishers of frequent forces like Pakistan-Bangladesh are here, then it is the first duty of Indian administration to identify them in the national interest and out of the national border.
Also read: The restlessness of political parties increased due to the tie of Hindutva in Bihar
It is important that until they get out, they should be denied franchise and national public facilities. Their Indian identity cards should be canceled. Because the smoldering question is that in a secular country like India, when a leader or intellectuals dare to glorify the oppression only for religious reasons, it should be the first duty of the Indian administration to take the strict action against them. Because no one can be allowed to do so on this holy Hindu land! Indian leaders and administration should take strict action against such traitors, eternal malevolent elements. There should be no negligence in this direction, otherwise they will be encouraged.
Needless to say that when we say India, it means that it is taken from the huge terrain of India including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Tibet, Verma, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives, which is a well -known Hindu land as the Indian subcontinent. If you read the Mahabharata, then you will know that this whole world was eternal, divinity was a mood and the demon or asura mijaji was separated from Hindus. Nevertheless, the dominance of Hindutva always remained in Aryavarta. Therefore, whether the Muslim invaders have been a batch or the army of the British Christians and the people associated with it, who came here as foreign invaders, killed the peace-loving people here and then have been created here. They converted on the strength of weapon and destroyed the Sanatan temples, his mentor princely states.
Since they are all external invaders, they have come from Mongol or Arabia, so their real place is in their original countries, not in Sanatan land! Because their sympathy is not with India, but from those countries. In the name of Hindus, by dividing the country and promoting the political politics in India again, it has been such a mistake of the Congress to build the Constitution, whose punishment has been punished by Hindu society. Because after independence, it was his responsibility to get Muslims and Christians out of the country, to end the memories associated with them and to establish the memories of Indian rulers, sages and gods, but he betrayed Hindu society in the name of secularism and Ganga-Yamuna culture.
This is because Sanatan land, Dev land is considered. This is the tapobhoomi of sages and sages. This is non -violent land. Whereas the nature of Muslims and Christians is violent. These people are carnivorous and also cruel. The Hindus who live in their secrets, also became the same as they are. They have given rise to social and ethnic malicious among Hindus with the policies of putting foot and governing. The modern constitutional system may call such elements secular. But in view of the destiny of their nature, fighting and riot-failure for centuries, it would be appropriate to either give them an opportunity to change themselves or be removed from the Indian subcontinent.
The change of time is that the Indian Constitution should be rebuilt in view of the natural needs of Sanatan land. Before this, one became such a strong ruler, who creates Akhand India. At the same time, give the Sanatan Moris who have been created in the Himalayas and convert to the Hindus to convert to heart changes, nature and rituals, otherwise they should be stubborn and focus on their religion in the same way as the Himalayas ie the Indian subcontinent, as if America is doing illegal migrants.
There is no doubt that Muslims and Christians are living in the Indian subcontinent, but Yashogan walks around Arab and Christian countries. Of cruel rulers or officials who ruled India. Especially in politics, those who do their Yashogan should be tried for treason. Today, political allegations and counter-allegations have intensified about the cruel king Aurangzeb, who did not happen to his father and brothers in the country.
In such a situation, the discussion of that last letter of Aurangzeb is appropriate here, the brain of those who glorify the one who will open. Because that last letter of Aurangzeb is mentioned in the books of history. In this, Aurangzeb tells the story of his sins himself. The controversial Mughal ruler has mentioned his crimes in regret before his death. The book ‘Aurangzeb Ki Last Raat’, written by noted historian Ram Kumar Verma, has been given that letter. It is necessary to read you so that the glorification of Aurangzeb of Mumbai’s Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi and has increased the controversy, you can also know the real reality of it.
If you see in the pages of history, you will find that the biggest name among the controversial Mughal rulers is Aurangzeb. Which implemented discriminatory policies like Jizia tax on non-Muslims. He got the head of Sikhs Guru Tegh Bahadur. He selected Guru Govind Singh’s sons alive in the wall. He broke the eyes of Sambhaji Maharaj, son of Chhatrapati Shivaji and uprooted the nails. During this reign, Fatwa-e-Alamgiri was implemented in India on the basis of Sharia and a large number of Hindu temples were destroyed. He destroyed Kashi Vishwanath and Somnath temples and killed millions of Hindus. Due to its cruelty, the Mughal Empire was able to expand the most in the entire Indian subcontinent. Aurangzeb died in 1707 AD.
It is said that before death, he regretted his crimes. Aurangzeb wrote letters to express his sons, Azam Shah and Kama Baksh to express his regret. In these letters, he mentioned about his sins and failures. What Aurangzeb wrote in his last letter is the story of his regrets. Aurangzeb had mentioned his sins in a letter written to his sons before he died. In this letter, he wrote that he did not do good to the people and his life passed fruitless. He also wrote that he would have to bear the consequences of his sins.
The book ‘Aurangzeb Ki Last Raat’, written by noted historian Ram Kumar Verma, mentions Aurangzeb’s letter. “Now I am old and weak. I do not know who I am and why I came in this world? I did not do well, my life has passed like this! I have to suffer the result of the sin that has happened to me.
Significantly, Aurangzeb’s father was Shah Jahan. Aurangzeb also oppressed his father. Aurangzeb imprisoned his father Shah Jahan in the Fort in Agra and craved him for water. Shah Jahan used very harsh words for Aurangzeb in his autobiography ‘Shahjahanama’. Shah Jahan wrote that God should not be born with anyone. Shah Jahan asked Aurangzeb to learn from Hindus who serve their parents and offer water to water after their death. He has written that Aurangzeb is a better Hindu, who serves his parents and offers it after his death.
This is the reason why Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Vishwasharma etc. have raised the splendor of SP leader Abu Azmi and his side -to -side. Yogi Adityanath has bluntly said that those who consider Aurangzeb as an ideal … remove that blanket from the party. Then Abu Azmi .. Send such a leader to UP, we will get treatment, we do not delay.
It is noteworthy that Aurangzeb wanted to divide his empire into his sons. He wanted to end succession, but his wish could not be fulfilled. His sons also resulted in the throne. There was a war of succession between his three sons Muhammad Mujjal, Muhammad Azam and Kambakhsh. His elder son Shahzada won Mujjal in the war and he killed his brother Muhammad Azam on 18 June 1707 AD and Kambakhsh in Hyderabad in January 1709 AD.
Explain that during the reign of Aurangzeb, the expansion of the Mughal Empire was almost in the entire Indian subcontinent. Aurangzeb died in 1707 AD. In a small village called Khuldabad near Aurangabad in Maharashtra, the tomb of Aurangzeb Alamgir was made directly in a plain manner. His grave was made of raw soil, on which no other roof was placed except the sky. When the tomb Mujavir applies green coach on his grave. This emperor of India lying in this raw tomb is still waiting for God to be introduced to God, burning in the fire of atonement. The question is also that when Aurangzeb ruled Delhi, why his grave in Aurangabad, Maharashtra? Did not even give him two yards of land in Delhi?
Since in the country’s politics these days, the cruel Mughal ruler Aurangzeb is in discussion and when Samajwadi Party leader Abu Azmi tried to glorify it, the controversy has increased over it. On the one hand, patriots are BJP leaders and on the other side there are traitors secular leaders, who are glorifying the invaders of India only on a religious basis. In this, leaders of political parties like Congress, SP, RJD, JDU, AIMIM, National Conference, AAP etc. are also making direct statements from the perspective of Muslim -based politics. It is not in the national interest. Does secularism allow the enemies of the country to be praised. If yes, then understand that the Indian administration is decorating its democratic pyre itself.
At the same time, the national president of the Hindu Army Vishnu Gupta has demanded the Government of India to officially declare Mughal ruler Aurangzeb as ‘barbaric ruler’. He has written a letter to the Union Home Minister and appealed to change the names of all the roads and places in the name of Aurangzeb and to shed the remains by digging their grave into the Arabian Sea. Vishnu Gupta wrote in the letter, ‘Aurangzeb persecuted Hindus and people of other religions during his reign. He killed his brothers and handed over the throne, father Shah Jahan in captivity. Did not even let his daughters get married. Aurangzeb brutally murdered Guru Tegh Bahadur, Gokula Jat and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. Apart from this, he broke many Hindu temples and monasteries and imposed jaziya on non-Muslims.
In a letter to the Home Minister, the Hindu Army Chief said that Aurangzeb’s intolerance and bigotry had to suffer crores of people. India is a country with peace and multiculture, where such a person should not be proud. Giving the example of America, he said that just as the remains of Osama bin Laden were shed in the sea, Aurangzeb’s grave should be removed and a school or hospital for the poor should be built there.
The Hindu army demands that first, Aurangzeb should be declared a barbaric ruler and made his praise a punishable offense. Second, the names of all the roads and places in the name of Aurangzeb should be changed. Third, the remains should be destroyed by digging the tomb of Aurangzeb and a school or hospital for the poor should be built at that place. It is noteworthy that Aurangzeb (1658–1707) ruled India for about 50 years. During his reign, he promoted religious discrimination and bigotry. According to many historians, Aurangzeb did not spare even his family to gain power. Due to his decree, many temples were demolished, kings of many states were taken hostage and religious taxes were levied on the general public. The Hindu army has appealed to the government to take action on this demand soon.
The question is why only Aurangzeb, from Muhammad bin Qasim to all Muslim invaders, Christian invaders and memories related to English officials, should be destroyed. Literary documents and history texts related to them should be banned. Their descendants should be declared out of the country by declaring them external or they should be trained to live in Sanatani dignity. The laws coming in it should be changed and the judges who came contrary to the Indian tradition should be reviewed. Cruelty should be erased from Sanatan land and it should be made a world guru again. The ruler who fails to fulfill these objectives should also be changed. It should be made Janmuhim. In this, the interest of Jambudweep lies.
– Kamlesh Pandey
Senior journalist and political analyst
