we are indians employees are also indians turkey linked celebi aviation argued in hc

Turkey

Years

The company has challenged the Civil Aviation Security Bureau of Bureau of Security (BCAS) to cancel its security approval in the interest of national security earlier this month.

Celebi Aviation Services India Private Limited argued in the Delhi High Court on Wednesday that we are an Indian company. Our employees are Indians. The company has challenged the Civil Aviation Security Bureau of Bureau of Security (BCAS) to cancel its security approval in the interest of national security earlier this month. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, on behalf of CE -Celabi Aviation, told the Delhi High Court that the company has been working in India without any faults for 17 years and the step of cancellation of security approval has been a violation of the principles of natural justice and the principles of natural justice are a very important case. My contracts are being canceled with the operators.

The High Court bench headed by Justice Sachin Dutta is hearing a Celebi plea against the May 15 order, which came to the publicly after Turkey’s publicly supported Pakistan and criticizing India’s attacks on terrorist camps, which raised the question whether the regulatory action was motivated by politics. However, Rohatgi confined his arguments to legal grounds and procedural flaws in the government’s decision. Citing the development of aviation safety regulations, Rohatgi argued that the legal structure has changed significantly compared to earlier examples. “The 1937 aircraft rules were considered in the judgment of Justice Kurian Joseph, which are no longer applicable. New rules were made in 2011 and the current status is ruled by Rule 12.

He emphasized that the hearing is mandatory before any rigorous decision like cancellation of security approval as per Rule 12. Wherever such decisions are taken, the principles of natural justice are applied. I was not even given notice, while the rule says that I should be given notice. I am not insisting on the copy of the reasons. I am saying that I was disabled because the material was not provided to me.

Other news

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top