Years
Vice President Dhankhar described the historic decision of 8 April as constitutional deviation “, in which the pending 10 Bills were approved by the Governor of Tamil Nadu and the time-limit was set to take action on the bills passed by the state assemblies for the President and the Governors.
The Supreme Court of India in 2010, while hearing a contempt case against the news portals for the statements against a High Court judge and his son, verbally commented that judges were not thick -skinned and they do not care. Presiding over the bench of the Supreme Court, Justice Suryakant said that we are not worried about these conditions. Such situations come every day. We are also thick skinned; We do not care about that part. This remark by Justice Kant came after criticism of the apex court for the decision given by the Vice President of India Jagdeep Dhankhar against the Governor of Tamil Nadu last week.
Vice President Dhankhar described the historical decision of April 8 as constitutional deviation “, in which the pending 10 Bills were approved by the Governor of Tamil Nadu and the time-limit was fixed for the President and the state assemblies to take action on the bills passed by the state assemblies. Dhankhar described the use of the Indian Constitution as a minimum of the Indian Constitution, which was also a minimum of the democracy, which is also a place of judiciary. In the meantime, the lawyer had directed the judge to protect himself and file a defamation suit during the recent hearing, during the recent hearing.
The lawyer had also attracted attention to public comments targeting the judiciary and urged the court to take cognizance of statements to prevent public confidence from decreasing.
Other news
